Answer :: IMCDb Forum

Send an answer to a topic: Non-Unidentified Vehicles

Subject
forum_emoticons.html	[quote=mike962,91979]simple truck https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle.php?id=1998003 this needs correction https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1103684-MAN.html https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_891279.html https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_431591.html https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_842017.html models https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1494883-Caterpillar.html https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1502047-Komatsu-Bucyrus.html https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1517018-Hitachi.html https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1364129-JCB.html https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1500133-Caterpillar.html https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1518875-Bombardier.html https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_646141-Caterpillar-D-Series.html https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1214826-Caterpillar-D-Series.html https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1066225-Caterpillar-D-Series.html https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1069697-Caterpillar-D-Series.html https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1020157-Caterpillar-D-Series.html https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1429170-P%26H.html[/quote]
	Options
	%Receive notification of answer to this topic by email%
	%Analyse text for smileys%
	%Analyse text for BBCode%

MisterZ

antp, agreed that these could be listed as wagon body type, but "Van" remaining in the model name.

Also, you forgot these two:

Built in Thailand:

https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_641230-Mazda-Bravo-UN-1999.html

1976:

https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1999681.html

antp

Quote From: MisterZ

"323 Van" (not wagon), body type: van, and trim level blank:

https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1998667-Mazda-323-Wagon-FA4-1981.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_624770-Mazda-323-FA4-1982.html

It is a edge case.
I would consider that as a 3-door commercial wagon, so rather wagon than van category, as it has the outside body of a wagon rather than a van.
In the same way, if you remove the rear sets of a hatchback or wagon (can be done for tax reasons in some European countries), I would not consider that as being changed to a van for the site.
But that's just my personal opinion, I can see these listed as van without issue :wink:

As anyway we tend to list the Holden Ute Vans as van rather than wagon, I think.

mike962

https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1999255.html

MisterZ

hachirokutrueno

Change to 2021 Subaru Crosstrek badged as XV Crosstrek [GT], and add Canada as the "Made for" country
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1838081-Subaru-XV-Crosstrek-GT.html

Although this is badged as an "XV Crosstrek" in Israel, this is actually a Canadian market vehicle. Additional context has been provided in the comments thread on the vehicle page.

mike962

since nobody can figure the coachmaker for 20 years maybe can be listed as Dodge M-Series , this Dodge chassis plus engine were used by roughly 50 coachmakers in the 70s ...

https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_29186.html
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1344106.html

nearly same story, coachbuilder badge can't be read here we even have Dodge badge inside
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1979629.html

https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1999255.html

mike962

https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1986643.html

by the very small size possibly class B or C motorhome and no cab view , if you see footage probably not that worth listitng

https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1577686.html

ChaserX

antp

Quote From: JB007

https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1998308-Volkswagen-Typ-2.html

It is still missing its model name... Tough that most of these could be listed without model name if nobody provides one, as it is not always possible to have one I suppose.

Quote From: JB007

https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1548328.html

Baube seems to disagree on this one

mike962