Delete a Message
BTW, in 2009 we failed to have a german prim-minister, Klaus Iohannis: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klaus_Iohannis .
He was proposed for this job by the new formed parliamentary majority, but Basescu refused to name him prime-minister. Which was TOTALLY illegal. I don't think there is a more grave violation of the constitution. This was the equivalent of a coup d'etat. Only for that (though he did many other things like that) Basescu deserved to be suspended by the parliament. And he was. (And the morons from EU said it's a coup d'etat.) And the decision of the parliament was submit to popular vote. And we voted FOR the destitution. And he came back anyway. This was (chronologicaly) the third coup d'etat of Basescu (who's place is in jail). His second coup d'etat was also in 2009. After the parliamentary elections, came the presidential elections. Officially, Basescu won the elections. With a very, very, very little difference. In reality, the elections were defrauded. At Romania's embassy from Paris, from instance, by the calculations made after the elections, voted some 5 men on second.
Tell that to Angela Merkel, if you meet her, please! She was one of the most enthusiastic and vocal supporters of Basescu, in 2012, when he was suspended.
At the presidential elections of 2009, Mircea Geoana (who I voted), the countercandidate of Basescu, said that, if he wins (and, in fact, he did), he will name prime-minister Klaus Iohannis. I have maximum respect for Iohannis. I can't imagine a better prime-minister. Unfortunately, all my hopes were in vain, because Basescu defrauded the elections.
He was proposed for this job by the new formed parliamentary majority, but Basescu refused to name him prime-minister. Which was TOTALLY illegal. I don't think there is a more grave violation of the constitution. This was the equivalent of a coup d'etat. Only for that (though he did many other things like that) Basescu deserved to be suspended by the parliament. And he was. (And the morons from EU said it's a coup d'etat.) And the decision of the parliament was submit to popular vote. And we voted FOR the destitution. And he came back anyway. This was (chronologicaly) the third coup d'etat of Basescu (who's place is in jail). His second coup d'etat was also in 2009. After the parliamentary elections, came the presidential elections. Officially, Basescu won the elections. With a very, very, very little difference. In reality, the elections were defrauded. At Romania's embassy from Paris, from instance, by the calculations made after the elections, voted some 5 men on second.
Tell that to Angela Merkel, if you meet her, please! She was one of the most enthusiastic and vocal supporters of Basescu, in 2012, when he was suspended.
At the presidential elections of 2009, Mircea Geoana (who I voted), the countercandidate of Basescu, said that, if he wins (and, in fact, he did), he will name prime-minister Klaus Iohannis. I have maximum respect for Iohannis. I can't imagine a better prime-minister. Unfortunately, all my hopes were in vain, because Basescu defrauded the elections.