I agree with the principles. It just comes down to what is considered worthy of inclusion on the site. I have posted pics of cars that weren't included when uploaded for being "too background" and thought that there are cars on the site that are less worthy.
I have thought some cars on some pages were;
a) barely identifiable or not at all.
b) too far away or too blurry to be of interest.
c) too common.
As for my point c, what constitutes an uncommon car. To a European resident, seeing a Peugeot or Renault is no big deal, but for the same car to appear in an Australian film would be more exceptional because they weren't sold in great numbers here. Likewise, to me a Holden Commodore is average, but to someone from outside Australia it may be of greater interest.
The other question to be posed is what to do with the multitudes of Backgroud cars already listed that don't meet the grading. Do we delete them all or leave them there. It would be a massive undertaking to remove all the background cars that didn't comply from all the movie pages.
Also when the shot is of someone driving the car taken through the windscreen or the side window in close up is it really a shot of the car or the actor.
Maybe we can have some form of voting system where we can vote for a week as to whether a car is of enough interest.
These are my thoughts, anyway.