General » Tank and "Made for Movie" corrections
Reminder of the previous message
Tank and "Made for Movie" corrections
Published 20/10/2025 @ 03:35:41, By
Harold BThanks
This one still isn't quite right. The name was simply "wz. 28" (or "Samochód Pancerny wz. 28" for long), no "B2" in the name. Everywhere online seems to report the chassis as a "Citroën-Kégresse B2", but the Kégresse versions of the Citroën B2 were K1 (which this is not) and P4T, which is the chassis the wz. 28 used.
so it should be CWS wz. 28
on Citroën-Kégresse B2 P.4T if you want to specify the chassis; there was no other version though
https://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_285194-Citro%C3%ABn-K%C3%A9gresse-B2-wz-28-1928.html
Tank and "Made for Movie" corrections
Published 20/10/2025 @ 03:38:06, By
Harold B
You could I guess, but "Vickers" always comes first in the way it's written about in books. I don't have any primary material that talks about it or I would defer to that.
Type 87 Armored Car is the Japanese military designation yes. None of them were actually built in Japan, that's old wrong info.
Latest Edition: 20/10/2025 @ 03:39:59
Tank and "Made for Movie" corrections
Published 20/10/2025 @ 08:28:49, By
antpI Updated the Citroën, I wasn't sure indeed if they kept the B2 or not in their model name
About Crossley, if you think it is better, I could list them as Vickers as make with Crossley in extra info then?
Or would it be better to have both names in the make name?
Latest Edition: 20/10/2025 @ 08:30:52
Tank and "Made for Movie" corrections
Published 20/10/2025 @ 13:04:36, By
Harold BOr would it be better to have both names in the make name?
That's what I would do. Or "Vickers" as the make and "Crossley Armoured Car" as the model
Tank and "Made for Movie" corrections
Published 20/10/2025 @ 17:06:40, By
antpIndeed I could do that latter one, two were listed that way
Search
List of Categories
Who has read this topic?
Add Reply
Printable version
Activate notification
